Course Overview |
This course is designed to help you, the student, to further develop your conversational skills, especially as students of English as a Foreign Language. The conversational skills that will be taught and (hopefully) acquired will help you in whatever endeavor you decide to pursue in the English-speaking world. Thus, this course is designed to help you develop your language skills as well as your speaking skills. This course is meant to be a continuation of English Conversation 1, and the ultimate goal here is to have you be able to clearly argue and discuss various perspectives of a particular social and/or cultural issue in English.
|
Keywords : English conversation, presentation skills, debate, argumentation
|
Prerequisites : Students should have already taken English Conversation 1 or its equivalent. Please consult with instructor if you have other considerations/circumstances that would help fulfill requirements.
Required Ability :
|
Notes |
Remote/On-site |
Information regarding Moodle |
|
対面授業 |
|
|
リアルタイム-オンライン授業 |
|
ハイブリッド授業(対面+オンライン) |
|
オンデマンド型授業 |
|
課題提出型授業 |
教職 : 教職(英語)
資格 :
|
Course Objectives |
|
かなり優れている |
優れている |
及第である |
一層の努力が必要 |
B_B1-c [外国語運用能力] Students will be required to apply the grammatical and conversational conventions they learn in class for their oral and written assessments. |
EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and contributions in English, can be evaluated as "outstanding." |
GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and contributions in English, can be evaluated as "good." |
AVERAGE/SATISFACTORY LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and contributions in English, can be evaluated as "satisfactory." |
DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and contributions in English, fall below average. More effort and application are required to pass. |
B_B1-f [批判的討論] Students will be required to debate their positions on a particular social or cultural issue in English for their final assessment. |
EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and contributions in English, can be evaluated as "outstanding." |
GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and contributions in English, can be evaluated as "good." |
AVERAGE/SATISFACTORY LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and contributions in English, can be evaluated as "satisfactory." |
DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and contributions in English, fall below average. More effort and application are required to pass. |
九州大学文学部ディプロマ・ポリシー 九州大学人文科学府人文基礎専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー
九州大学人文科学府歴史空間論専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー 九州大学人文科学府言語・文学専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー
九州大学文学部哲学コース・カリキュラムマップ 九州大学文学部歴史学コース・カリキュラムマップ
九州大学文学部文学コース・カリキュラムマップ 九州大学文学部人間科学コース・カリキュラムマップ
|
Course Plan |
授業形態(項目) |
授業形態(内容) |
|
講義 |
|
|
外国語演習 |
|
原典資料演習 |
|
実習/フィールド調査 |
|
Problem-Based Learning (問題発見・解決型学習) |
|
学生のプレゼンテーション |
|
Moodle の使用 |
|
学外実習 |
|
野外実習 |
Textbooks : Soars, Liz, and John Soars. 2010. American Headway 3, 2nd ed. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reference Books :
Course Handouts : Handouts will be made available in a dedicated Dropbox folder.
Course Plan ()
|
Tentative Weekly Schedules |
Lecture |
Exercise, Field trip etc. |
Comments, suggestions for the course preparation, review, etc. |
1 |
Introduction: A world of difference |
○ |
|
|
2 |
The work week |
○ |
|
|
3 |
Good times, bad times |
○ |
|
|
4 |
Getting it right |
○ |
|
|
5 |
Our changing world |
○ |
|
|
6 |
What matters to me |
○ |
|
|
7 |
Passions and fashions |
○ |
|
|
8 |
MIDTERM EXAM |
○ |
|
|
9 |
No fear |
○ |
|
|
10 |
It depends on how you look at it - how to have a successful debate |
○ |
|
|
11 |
Socratic Seminar |
○ |
|
|
12 |
CHRISTMAS (OBSERVED) - NO CLASS |
○ |
|
|
13 |
Seeing is believing |
○ |
|
|
14 |
Telling it like it is |
○ |
|
|
15 |
Final debate presentations |
○ |
|
|
|
Evaluation |
Standpoint→ Evaluation Method ↓ |
B_B1-c [外国語運用能力] |
B_B1-f [批判的討論] |
Grading Percentage, Disqualification etc. |
Class tests |
◎ |
○ |
30% |
Presentation |
◎ |
◎ |
40% |
In-class contribution |
◎ |
○ |
30% |
GPA Evaluation
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
授業を通じて、総じて「かなり優れている」に相当する活動を行った。 |
授業を通じて、概ね「優れている」を超える活動を行った。 |
授業を通じて、「及第する」に相当する活動を行った。 |
授業を通じて、総じて「及第する」には達しないものの、それに近い活動を行った。 |
授業を通じて、「一層の努力が必要」の活動にとどまった。 |
Additional Information regarding Evaluation Method : Midterm exam: 30% Final debate presentation: 40% Various assignments assigned throughout the semester: 30%
|
Study Consultation (Office Hours) |
Study Consultation (Office Hours) :
Suggestion for success (Specific) : Please let me know if you are having difficulties comprehending the material - I am free to talk whenever I am in my office. I can also make appointments via email.
:
|