IMAP Department of Philosophy (Credit 2) 必修 Intended Year: Intended School:

Research, Readings, and Methods Research, Readings, and Methods Sub Title　 Research in Japanese Humanities; co-taught by Van Goethem and Lazarus Assistant Professor Associate Professor Ashton LAZARUS Ellen Van GOETHEM

Numbering Code: Course Code: 2019 FallTerm weekly Tue2 Ito A-105 Classroom E科目 (English, English)

: 2019/9/3 (14:58)

Course Overview	In this seminar students will acquire and develop the practical specialist knowledge and skills needed for research in Japanese humanities, including the fields of archaeology, art history, cultural history, history, literature, and religious studies. After laying the foundation by reviewing style and writing requirements, learning how to summarize and critique a lecture and analyze an essay, create an annotated bibliography, and other research skills, students will present their work. Seminar activities include class discussions, the completion of an online course, and student presentations in addition to faculty and guest lectures.
	Keywords : Text analysis, logical thinking, scholarly practice and convention
	Prerequisites : None Required Ability : Good English reading and writing
Notes	Remote/On-site Information regarding Moodle 対面授業 リアルタイム-オンライン授業 ハイブリッド授業（対面＋オンライン） オンデマンド型授業 課題提出型授業 教職 : 資格 :
Course Objectives	かなり優れている 優れている 及第である 一層の努力が必要 MP_B1-b [書誌の作成] 関連する先行研究について網羅的な書誌を作成できる。 EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." SAT/PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass. MP_B1-c [理論的な分析] EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." SAT/PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass. MP_B2-a [総合把握力] EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." SAT/PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass. DP_B2-b [コミュニケーション能力] EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." SAT/PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass. 九州大学文学部ディプロマ・ポリシー　　　九州大学人文科学府人文基礎専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー 九州大学人文科学府歴史空間論専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー　　　九州大学人文科学府言語・文学専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー 九州大学文学部哲学コース・カリキュラムマップ　　　九州大学文学部歴史学コース・カリキュラムマップ 九州大学文学部文学コース・カリキュラムマップ　　　九州大学文学部人間科学コース・カリキュラムマップ
Course Plan	授業形態（項目） 授業形態（内容） 講義 外国語演習 原典資料演習 実習／フィールド調査 Problem-Based Learning （問題発見・解決型学習） 学生のプレゼンテーション Moodle の使用 学外実習 野外実習 Textbooks : Course materials will be distributed by the instructors. Reference Books : Course Handouts : Course Plan () Tentative Weekly Schedules Lecture Exercise, Field trip etc. Comments, suggestions for the course preparation, review, etc. 1 See syllabus ○ 2 See syllabus ○ 3 See syllabus ○ 4 See syllabus ○ 5 See syllabus ○ 6 See syllabus ○ 7 See syllabus ○ 8 See syllabus ○ 9 See syllabus ○ 10 See syllabus ○ 11 See syllabus ○ 12 See syllabus ○ 13 See syllabus ○ 14 See syllabus ○ 15 See syllabus ○
Evaluation	Standpoint→ Evaluation Method ↓ MP_B1-b [書誌の作成] MP_B1-c [理論的な分析] MP_B2-a [総合把握力] DP_B2-b [コミュニケーション能力] Grading Percentage, Disqualification etc. Attendance ○ ○ ○ ○ In-class contribution ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎ Class tests ○ ○ ○ ○ Report ◎ ○ ◎ ○ GPA Evaluation A B C D F 授業を通じて、総じて「かなり優れている」に相当する活動を行った。 授業を通じて、概ね「優れている」を超える活動を行った。 授業を通じて、「及第する」に相当する活動を行った。 授業を通じて、総じて「及第する」には達しないものの、それに近い活動を行った。 授業を通じて、「一層の努力が必要」の活動にとどまった。 Additional Information regarding Evaluation Method : Additional Information regarding Evaluation Method : Biography (drafts, final version, presentation) (30%) Article analysis presentation (10%) Online Course homework (20%) Tests (20%) Response assignments (5–20%) Other (5–20%)
Study Consultation (Office Hours)	Study Consultation (Office Hours) : Suggestion for success (Specific) : :