IMAP Department of Philosophy

(Credit 2)
選択科目
Intended Year: IMAP 1 or 1
Intended School: Humanities (IMAP)
Topics in Japanese Art and Architectural History III
Topics in Japanese Art and Architectural History III
Sub Title　 Architecture and Spatial Experience in Premodern Japan
Professor Anton SCHWEIZER
 Numbering Code:
Course Code:
2023 SpringTerm
weekly Thu2
Ito D108 Classroom
E科目 (English, English)
: 2023/3/28 (15:25) 〔n/a〕
Course Overview This course explores concepts and meanings manifested in places during Japan’s Premodern period. We will discuss works of architecture, planned sites, and spatial arrangements as well as painterly representations of buildings and sites. Our focus will be on the period of roughly the 1550s to 1870s but there will be some outliers. We will use mostly English secondary literature but also work on selected readings from:
Chino Kaori 千野香織 and Nishi Kazuo 西和夫. Fikushon toshite no kaiga: Bijutsushi no me, kenchikushi no me フィクションとしての絵画：美術史の眼・建築史の眼 (Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社, 1991).
This will simultaneously build reading ability and bring us to better understand Japanese theoretical approaches to works of architecture and their representation in painting.
Keywords : Architecture, art history, spatial studies
Prerequisites : None
Required Ability : Fluency in English speaking, reading, and writing
Notes n/a
Remote/On-site Information regarding Moodle
● 対面授業 n/a
リアルタイム-オンライン授業
ハイブリッド授業（対面＋オンライン）
オンデマンド型授業
課題提出型授業

教職 :
資格 :
Course Objectives
かなり優れている 優れている 及第である 一層の努力が必要
MP_A-b [芸術作品の理解]
芸術学を対象とする領域では、芸術作品を正確に理解するとともに、重要な先行研究をふまえて作品を分析 し考察できる。		 EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass.
MP_A-c [研究史と方法論の説明]
 EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass.
MP_B1-b [書誌の作成]
 EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass.
MP_B1-c [理論的な分析]
 EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass.
DP_B1-b [理論的な分析]
 EXCELLENT LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "outstanding." GOOD LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "good." PASS LEVEL: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes is evaluated as "average and satisfactory." DEFICIENT: Student achievement in this area, as measured through his/her level of class preparation and participation, completion of assignments, and performance on the quizzes falls below satisfactory; more effort and application are required to pass.
九州大学文学部ディプロマ・ポリシー　　　九州大学人文科学府人文基礎専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー
九州大学人文科学府歴史空間論専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー　　　九州大学人文科学府言語・文学専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー
九州大学文学部哲学コース・カリキュラムマップ　　　九州大学文学部歴史学コース・カリキュラムマップ
九州大学文学部文学コース・カリキュラムマップ　　　九州大学文学部人間科学コース・カリキュラムマップ
Course Plan
授業形態（項目） 授業形態（内容）
● 講義
● 外国語演習
原典資料演習
実習／フィールド調査
● Problem-Based Learning （問題発見・解決型学習）
● 学生のプレゼンテーション
Moodle の使用
学外実習
野外実習

Textbooks : No textbook is used ｜ Short readings will be distributed as PDFs by the teacher ｜ Short readings will be distributed as PDFs by the teacher
Reference Books : Will be distributed via Dropbox
Course Handouts : Will be distributed via Dropbox

Course Plan ()
Tentative Weekly Schedules Lecture Exercise, Field trip etc. Comments, suggestions for the course preparation, review, etc.
1 4/13 Introduction to the course ○ class Every participant should have looked into Chino’s and Nishi’s book and have three options for a section to lead discussion on.
2 4/20 Architectural space as structured experience ○ class
3 4/27 Interior space as ensemble ○ class 1) Jonathan Hay. Sensuous Surfaces: The Decorative Object in Early Modern China (University of Hawai’i Press, 2010), pp. 271-307.
2) Gerhart, Karen M.: The Eyes of Power: Art and Early Tokugawa Authority. (University of Hawai’i Press, 1999), pp. 1-33.
4 5/11 Representing architectural space in painting ○ class 1) Matthew G. Stavros. Kyoto: An Urban History of Japan’s Premodern Capital (University of Hawai’i Press, 2014), pp. 43-101.
2) Fiévé, Nicolas: “Kyoto’s Famous Places: Collective Memory and ‘Monuments’ in the Tokugawa Period.” In: Fiévé, Nicolas & Paul Waley (eds.): Japanese Capitals in Historical Perspective: Place, Power and Memory in Kyoto, Edo and Tokyo (London: Routledge Curzon, 2003), pp. 153-71.
5 5/18 Mandatory field trip ○ Field trip
6 5/19 (Fri!) Stephen Whiteman seminar ○ class
7 5/25 Architecture as expression of status I: Elite ○ class 1) William H. Coaldrake: “Edo Architecture and Tokugawa Law,” Monumenta Nipponica 36:3 (Autumn, 1981), pp. 235-284.
8 6/8 Presentations ○ class
9 6/15 Presentations ○ class
10 6/22 No class ○ no class
11 6/29 No class ○ no class
12 7/6 No class ○ no class
13 7/13 Exhibition spaces ○ class
14 7/20 Architecture and national identity ○ class 1) Christine M. E. Guth: “Japan 1868-1945: Art, Architecture, and National Identity,” Art Journal, 55:3 (Autumn, 1996), pp. 16-20.
2) Jonathan Reynolds, “Ise Shrine and a Modernist Construction of Japanese Tradition,” Art Bulletin, Vol.83, No.2 (Jun., 2001), pp. 316-341.
3) Sandra Kaji O’Grady: “Authentic Japanese Architecture after Bruno Taut: the Problem of Eclecticism,” Fabrications 11:2 (September, 2001), pp. 1-12.
15 7/27 Preservation and Heritage ○ class 1) Miho Fukuda 福田美穗, “‘Repair by Disassembly’ (kaitai shūri) in Japan.” In eds. K. Weiler and N. Gutschow, Authenticity in Architectural Heritage Conservation: Discourses, Opinions, Experiences in Europe, South and East Asia, pp. 247-260. Cham/Switzerland: Springer, 2016
2) Masafumi Yamasaki and Paul Whaley, “Kyoto and the Revitalization of Urban Landscapes.” In eds. Fiévé and Whaley, Japanese Capitals in Historical Perspective, pp. 347-366.

Evaluation
Standpoint→
Evaluation Method
↓		 MP_A-b
[芸術作品の理解]		 MP_A-c
[研究史と方法論の説明]		 MP_B1-b
[書誌の作成]		 MP_B1-c
[理論的な分析]		 DP_B1-b
[理論的な分析]		 Grading Percentage, Disqualification etc.
Report ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎
In-class contribution ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎
Presentation ○ ○ ○ ◎ ◎
Attendance ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

GPA Evaluation
A B C D F
授業を通じて、総じて「かなり優れている」に相当する活動を行った。 授業を通じて、概ね「優れている」を超える活動を行った。 授業を通じて、「及第する」に相当する活動を行った。 授業を通じて、総じて「及第する」には達しないものの、それに近い活動を行った。 授業を通じて、「一層の努力が必要」の活動にとどまった。

Additional Information regarding Evaluation Method : n/a
Study Consultation (Office Hours) Study Consultation (Office Hours) : By appointment, in person or online

Suggestion for success (Specific) : Active participation is more important than factual knowledge.

: n/a